Skip to content
AGENTIC Data Mining

EconomicIQ · County & city economic intelligence

See your economy as a living system.

Ask your county a question and get an answer built from 30 public datasets, loaded for that county — reconciled against each other and traced back to the agency that published every number.

Explore how jobs, housing, income, business, climate and public records connect. Every relationship leads back to evidence.

Interactive county economic evidence graph A draggable network connecting Mitchell County to economic measures and public data sources. MITCHELLCOUNTY JOBS HOUSING INCOME BUSINESS CLIMATE COMMUTE BLS CENSUS BEA FEMA
Select a node to inspect its role in the evidence chain.

One question

Every number arrives with its margin

The assistant does not summarize a PDF. It reads the county's loaded data, and each figure it returns carries the address of the cell it came from — so the question "where did that come from?" has an answer before anyone asks it.

Analyst · Mitchell County, NC

“Is our housing stock shrinking?”

ACS.2019_2023.37121 .housing_units

No. Within one consistent control base the stock rose by 34 units, and the margin of error on that is ±61 — wide enough that the direction itself is not settled.

REGISTER .housing-stock-decline-134

The 134-unit decline you may have seen quoted is a census control-base switch between vintages, not a real loss of housing. It is on the register of claims this system will not make.

Wording is illustrative. The cell addresses, the register entry and the ±61 margin are the real ones.

Inside the portal

Six ways into the same evidence

One county, one set of loaded sources, six views over it. Nothing here is a separate export that can drift from the others — the report, the graph and the assistant all read the same cells.

The register

The useful part is what it will not say

A confident wrong number is worse than no number, because it survives into a grant application, a council packet, or a site-selection memo. So the claims this system must never make are written down as data — 7 named false claims and 8 data traps that produce a wrong number even from real source data. They are enforced when a tool answers, and screened again on the way out.

  • False claim

    Housing stock shrank by 134 units.

    housing-stock-decline-134

    A census control-base switch between ACS vintages, not a decline. Within one consistent base the stock rose 34 units — against a margin of error of 61, which does not even settle the sign.

  • Data trap

    This county’s fair-market rent rose to the state floor.

    hud-fmr-statewide-floor

    The published figure is a statewide floor applied to the county, not a county measurement. Reading it as local rent movement invents a trend the source never reported.

  • Data trap

    Each mining job supports 3.4 other jobs.

    no-economic-multiplier-ever

    No employment multiplier exists in anything loaded here. A plausible number with no source behind it is the most expensive kind of wrong.

The register is data, not a code branch: a newly found trap is an entry plus a test. When a question lands on one, the answer says so and stops, rather than reaching for the nearest plausible figure.

Coverage

30 datasets, and an honest edge

30 datasets are loaded per county, and every one of them is backed by real rows rather than a listing. That is a smaller number than the full Agentic Data Mining catalog on purpose: a dataset keyed on a stock number, a patent assignee or an SEC registrant has no county in it, and assigning one would be the first false claim on the register.

Every source clears licence review and a QA gate before it is loaded, and new ones join as they clear. Coverage still stops somewhere for every county, and the Sources view says where — what is held, what vintage it is, which of it this edition actually cites, and what it does not reach.